Google obszernie wyja\u015bnia przyczyny tego stanu rzeczy. Ot\u00f3\u017c je\u015bli wyszukujemy takich hase\u0142, jak „judaizm\u201d czy „nar\u00f3d \u017cydowski\u201d, otrzymujemy z regu\u0142y adekwatne, rzeczowe rezultaty. Natomiast has\u0142o „\u017byd\u201d, poniewa\u017c bywa u\u017cywane w\u00a0negatywnym kontek\u015bcie i nabra\u0142o swoistego znaczenia ubocznego, nader cz\u0119sto daje odno\u015bniki o w\u0142a\u015bnie antysemickich tre\u015bciach.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Google t\u0142umaczy si\u0119 te\u017c, i\u017c algorytmy u\u017cywane do wyszukiwania informacji na Internecie, z powodu swej niezwyk\u0142ej z\u0142o\u017cono\u015bci nie zawsze mog\u0105 odpowiednio zareagowa\u0107 na „subtelno\u015bci j\u0119zykowe\u201d i daj\u0105 rezultaty, kt\u00f3rych nie spos\u00f3b przewidzie\u0107. I oczywi\u015bcie Google zdecydowanie odcina si\u0119 od wszystkich tre\u015bci, jakie nie s\u0105 pozytywne dla \u017byd\u00f3w, a kt\u00f3re niestety odnalaz\u0142a ich wyszukiwarka – a zarazem przypomina, i\u017c rezerwuje sobie prawo usuwania stron, kt\u00f3re \u0142ami\u0105 „Wytyczne Webmastera\u201d albo kt\u00f3re, ich zdaniem, s\u0105 sprzeczne z obowi\u0105zuj\u0105cym prawem.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Poni\u017cej, ku pami\u0119ci, zamieszczamy angloj\u0119zyczny orygina\u0142 wyja\u015bnienia. Zarazem wyra\u017camy swe zdziwienie, dlaczego to akurat s\u0142owo „\u017byd\u201d („Jew\u201d) posiada tak negatywne konotacje u wszystkich narod\u00f3w, kt\u00f3re mia\u0142y zaszczyt go\u015bci\u0107 u siebie przedstawicieli narodu \u017cydowskiego. Dlaczego \u017byd kojarzy si\u0119 wiekszo\u015bci znacznie gorzej ni\u017c Tatar, Rosjanin czy nawet Grenlandczyk? To bez w\u0105tpienia spisek.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Oczywi\u015bcie my\u015bl o tym, i\u017c nar\u00f3d \u017cydowski w jakiej\u015b tam cz\u0119\u015bci zas\u0142u\u017cy\u0142 sobie na bardzo negatywne konotacje, \u017cadnemu przyzwoitemu cz\u0142owiekowi do g\u0142owy przyj\u015b\u0107 nie mo\u017ce, a gdyby przysz\u0142a, to ju\u017c j\u0105 wy\u0142api\u0105 specjalne skanery w miejscach publicznych, a dalsze kroki podejmie policja i prokuratura. ALbowiem z definicji \u017cadne informacje, kt\u00f3re s\u0105 dla \u017byd\u00f3w „disturbing\u201d, prawdziwe by\u0107 nie mog\u0105.<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Osobom zainteresowanym wy\u0142\u0105cznie najprawdziwsz\u0105 prawd\u0105 polecamy portal<\/p>\r\n\r\n
An explanation of our search results.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n If you recently used Google to search for the word „Jew,\u201d you may have seen results that were very disturbing.<\/em> We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We\u2019d like to explain why you\u2019re seeing these results when you conduct this search.<\/p>\r\n\r\n A site\u2019s ranking in Google\u2019s search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page\u2019s relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for „Jew\u201d brings up one such unexpected result.<\/p>\r\n\r\n If you use Google to search for „Judaism,\u201d „Jewish\u201d or „Jewish people,\u201d the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for „Jew\u201d different? One reason is that the word „Jew\u201d is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word „Jewish\u201d when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:<\/p>\r\n\r\n http:\/\/shakti.trincoll.edu\/~mendele\/vol01\/vol01.174<\/a> Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like „Judaism,\u201d „Jewish people,\u201d or „Jews\u201d than the single word „Jew.\u201d In fact, prior to this incident, the word „Jew\u201d only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it\u2019s likely that the great majority of searches on Google for „Jew\u201d are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.<\/p>\r\n\r\n The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.<\/p>\r\n\r\n We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.<\/p>\r\n\r\n Sincerely,![\"Jewgle\"](\"http:\/\/marucha.files.wordpress.com\/2010\/02\/jewgle_color_crop.jpg?w=373&h=103\" "\\"jewgle_color_crop\\"")
<\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\n\r\n
\r\n http:\/\/www.jewishworldreview.com\/cols\/jonah081500.asp<\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\n The Google Team<\/p>\r\n\r\n